Findings with context, evidence and a validation level defined by the agreed scope.
Public certificate records, exposed infrastructure search engines, breach datasets and active enumeration, combined. A single source can miss subdomains, assets using third-party certificates and leaked credentials — we connect the sources.
Cited evidence and an explicit validation level. The Full Assessment adds manual finding review.
IAM, access policies, network architecture and best practices, depending on the project. The attack surface that is too often overlooked.
Direct handshake: protocol, issuer, expiration and SAN. No reliance on third-party tools.
Infrastructure-as-code reviews: network segmentation, unnecessary exposure and best practices before deployment.
AI-generated HTML and PDF reports. Ready for the board, without needing someone to translate the technical details.
Security leadership by subscription: diagnosis and a 90-day plan, identity governance, incident readiness and a monthly committee. AI agents prepare the work and a person signs.
Explore: hover or tap a capability
Information security leadership by subscription. AI agents prepare the work and a named person answers for every deliverable. It applies the framework from our 2026 paper.
Executive owner, critical inventory, obligations and access gaps.
Priority MFA, authorized pentest and incident procedures.
Remediation, retest, tabletop exercise and restore test.
Risk committee, comparable metrics and program adjustments.
Read-only evidence, inventory, policy drafts, control mapping and risk register. Every claim links to a source artifact. What does not link is marked as an assumption, not a finding.
Risk acceptance, board communication, incident decisions and every sign-off or attestation. Each deliverable carries the name of whoever reviewed it and what they reviewed.
The agent works read-only with least privilege, with scope and logging per client. One client's information is never used in another's work, and personal data is minimized before it reaches a model.
No access to your internal systems is needed to get started. Nothing to install on your side.
Share your domain and confirm the authorized scope. Nothing starts without it.
Multi-source reconnaissance, with every finding verified through reproducible evidence before it is recorded.
Executive and technical reporting, prioritized by actual severity, with actionable remediation.
Here is what your report looks like. Every finding includes its severity, status and supporting evidence.
Tell us what you need to protect. We’ll define the scope, deliverables and a quote tailored to your project.
Free: an initial email summary. Exposure Scan: multi-source reconnaissance and an executive PDF report. Full Assessment: manual verification, cloud review and a debrief within the agreed scope.
Multi-source external reconnaissance with an executive PDF report. Scope and delivery date agreed before starting.
Red teaming with adversarial verification. Every finding is tested before it makes the list.
Regular reassessment beyond an annual snapshot. Scales with the number of areas you cover.
What businesses ask before getting started.
The Exposure Scan is delivered in days, not weeks. The Full Assessment, with manual verification of every finding, takes longer depending on scope — we agree on a specific delivery date before starting.
Not to get started. Initial reconnaissance is external and unauthenticated; it may include direct HTTP/TLS requests. Any authenticated testing or action that changes system state requires your explicit authorization, recorded before we proceed.
Each finding includes evidence and its validation level. The Exposure Scan documents external signals; the Full Assessment adds manual verification within the agreed scope.
We notify you immediately, without waiting for the final report. A critical finding is escalated as soon as it is verified, with evidence and a remediation recommendation.
Before starting, we agree on evidence access, retention and deletion, as well as the AI processing mode and providers involved in the service.
Yes — that is the most common starting point. Many clients use it to see the level of detail before choosing a Full Assessment or Ongoing Security.
A free initial external review. Summary in 24–48 hours.
